Hey, I never said don't let your voice be heard, but let's try to keep it realistic. I know a bit of how the diecast industry works, I know how business works, and I know what a company like Code 3 wants to do. Make money. Face it, all these ideas from out in left field do NOTHING but make us look like a bunch of raving lunatics. Few things I've seen here are good ideas, and they're buried amongst the stuff is so unrealistic that no one is going to take seriously. And when those aren't taken seriously, then the people who sugest them aren't taken seriously, and JD continues to get his entire release line from a couple of buffs on the East Coast who speak for the entire community.
Listen, Code 3 is going to do rigs from major U.S. manufactuers that are widely used. Start there, what are some of the widely used rigs? ALF, Pierce, E-One, Seagrave. Those are the molds Code 3 curently has, so suggest rigs that use those molds. If Code 3 can get more use out of each mold, then the per-unit price continues to go down, and they make more money.
If you're thinking of new molds, remember, Code 3 needs to get legs out of thier releases. Face it, we all don't like repaints, but that's how they make thier product cost effective. When you're thinking of what you want Code 3 to do, you have to think what are 4 or 5 other rigs that Code 3 can make with that particular cab design. IThink how many ALF Eagles we've seen, Pierce Dashes, Quantums, etc. If it's a one-and-done, it's either going to be a loss to the company, or a high retail price to the consumer. Which do you think it's going to be? I don't know many companies that purposely produce product at a loss.
Second, you can suggest any department you want, and hope that some day Code 3 wil listen to you and you'll see it on the front page the first Friday of the month, but to do so, a cell phone picture of a rig at a parade isn't going to cut it. You need measurements, walk-arounds, detailed photos, color-correct images, specifications, department history, contacts within the department, etc. It's not as easy as it seems.
And when you suggest departments that you want to see done, stop and think if 1,499 other people would buy it. 4 people here saying "i'll buy it" doesn't mean it's going to sell. I know there are a dozen or so rigs that I would buy right now that would be a very hard sell to anyone else. Look at what sells, and what doesn't sell. Think Lafayette, Tarrytown, Ventura County, Glendale Lime, what do all those have in common? Think Bedford Park, Annadale, Witchita, Hamilton, what do all those have in common?
The problem here is that everyone is all over the place and more than half the stuff is flat-out unrealistic. Post all you want, but don't think that the rural FD from North Dakota, with the plain markings and a mold that Code 3 doesn't produce, is going to see the light of day any time soon. You have to start thinking in terms of what will make Code 3 the most money, sell the most product and be the most cost effective in the long run.
And I'll hang a bunch of this on John Dunkel as well. If Code 3's release schedule wasn't a top shelf secret and he would simply tell us what the new molds are, and are likely to be, then we can begin to narrow down our selctions of apparatus that we think they should do. No sense in sending in 100 different Spartan photos when they have no plans of doing a Spartan. We'll be lucky to see any new molds any time soon, maybe the 900, and that's probably about it. Even if we do, it's probably going to be one a year to 18 months, and they likely have the first few, if not the first 5-6 releases already planned out.
Point is, people are all over the map on this board, I want this, I want that, I want I want I want I want, without taking a realistic look at what they're asking for. I have no problem with anyone asking for anything, but when we're seeing dozens different trucks, all with molds that Code 3 doesn't produce, instead of rigs with molds that Code 3 currently produces, or molds that code 3 should produce and a compelling reason why they should, there's no reason for JD to even give any of it a second thought.
If we all pushed for similar things. For instance, a new round of ambulances based on the Ford F-350 cab and a Horton or similar box, and kept it to that, that would be a compelling reason for JD to listen. Not 24 different ambulances spread out across Ford, Dodge Sprinters, International, Freightliner, Chevy, et al. So what does JD choose from? Where is the unified voice that gets him to stop, listen and think "We should do another run of ambulances with X cab"?
And just look at how disorganized this board is. We have 2 topics of "JD Listen, these are the major departments we want" When JD himself started the topic of "New Product Suggestions", people couldn't follow the directions and just replied to the original post instead of starting a new topic in the R&D section, titled with the rig, ONE photo, a description of the appratus and why Code 3 should make it. I doubt JD really even looks at most of it, simply becuase he can't find any of it. He has other things to do than go through 200 different posts with 100 different rigs in each. If there's any chance to grab his attention, it's going to have to be in an organized and cohesive fashion.
But, that's just my opinion...